The Benefits of Renting Desk Space

6 Comments

In a post last year, I discussed the pros and cons of working from a home office versus having a location separate from your home.  The author of this current guest post discusses sharing office space with other writers (renting a desk, in other words), a situation that I’ve heard is becoming increasingly common (but I have no data to back that up).

The Benefits of Renting Desk Space

While many small business ventures start out at home, whether you’re a frelancer or an entrepreneur, a move into office space could well benefit you greatly in the long run. Some people, such as journalists or web designers, may feel a home office is perfectly adequate; but there are many things worth considering before ruling out a move into a dedicated office building.

Professionalism, Progress and the Work/Life Balance

Working from home can offer distractions that prevent you from simply getting on with the job, as well as blurring the boundaries between your home and work commitments. Having a dedicated office space prevents certain distractions, such as the television or housework. By having an office space, you’ll also be adding a professional edge to your name. Whether it’s simply having an office address or a professional place to meet clients, an office address can give you an edge over the competition.

Leaving the home and heading to work can help you cross a psychological barrier between the two, as well as putting you in an environment conducive to work. One of the real advantages is that youre likely to be entering an area with like-minded individuals, often other creative freelancers.

This can be great both professionally and socially, as you can make new contacts, bounce ideas off of each other and even form friendships. Pus, you may find more work or be able to offload parts of jobs onto others who are more suited to meet different clients’ needs.

Flexible, Inexpensive and Hassle Free

Even if you can understand how an office may help you work and improve your business, you may be worried about issues such as cash and commitment. However, with the growing number of desk share schemes available, this fear is a thing of the past.

All cities and many towns now have a variety of shared and serviced offices available, where you can rent as little as a single desk for as long as you need, and as many hours or days that you need. Contracts tend to be monthly, with the flexibility to add more desks as well as cancel completely if you find its not for you.

Better still, it is hassle free. Everything from the desk itself to broadband, heating and kitchen facilities are in place, giving you a ready-made office environment as well as security and insurance. And the prices start low, too, so you dont need to break the bank. The more you pay, the better location, facilities and style youll find available.

Of course, if you want to make an impression, things scale up to professional, serviced offices with advanced facilities such as IT support, executive areas, post services and receptions. Plus, all the admin is done for youall you need to do is turn up and pay the monthly inclusive bill.

Shared offices aren’t for everyone. Some people dont want the companyespecially if they cant choose who they’re sharing office space with–and some want the choice of broadband supplier or furniture themselves. But for a lot of freelancers, a shared office environment can feel like a new lease on business and an introduction to a world of new possibilities.

About the author: Chris Marling writes on behalf of www.officegenie.co.uk, the UK’s first proper online marketplace for desk space and shared office space. [Note from Heidi: I was not financially compensated for this article. Even though the writer works for a desk space company, I feel his ideas are valid and worth considering, which is why I agreed to this post.]

The Three Rs of Writing: Revision, Revision, Revision

14 Comments

This fall I started dancing again. Not in the “dance as though no one is watching” metaphorical way, but in the “attending dance classes and rehearsing my behind off” way. (For those who don’t know, before I was a writer I was a dancer but an injury forced me to cut my dancing career short.) Recently, in addition to learning the moves for a routine, I observed the class as a whole: How the 12 of us went from watching the instructor do something that seemed impossible, to tentatively trying it ourselves approximately 1000 times, to eventually getting most of the routine down (we still have to practice at home so we get the attitude just right).

And a thought hit me.

I think you’d be hard-pressed to find a dancer who would watch a full-length ballet and assume the ballerina learned the entire dance perfectly on the first try. They know she sweated bullets over it; that she practiced move after move and sequence after sequence, until her grande jetes seemed as effortless as breathing and her toes bled and her muscles ached and she didn’t have the energy to try even once more. She probably had moments where she doubted she could pull off the ballet–certainly at the start of the career, she did–and where even one more pirouette seemed impossible.

I think you can extend that the to audience in general, not just to the dancers. Aside from children, who take joy in the magic of ballet, most people wouldn’t assume that the dancers got the full ballet perfect on the first try. Even the audience knows that years of practice, discipline and training have gone into every move.

So why do we get it into our heads that writers get their books perfect on the first manuscript? I know there’s a difference between doing something physical and something mental, but I still think the comparison applies. We know that football players have gone over the same play repeatedly until it’s perfect, we know that doctors practice techniques for their surgeries, we know that pianists repeat their scales over and over again until their fingers feel as though they will fall off. We know that directors film movie scenes repeatedly until they see exactly what they want on their screen (otherwise, those funny outtake DVD extras wouldn’t exist, and who wants to live in a world without outtakes? Not this writer-dancer-outtake lover.)

So why do we expect that our book will be perfect without revision?

Most authors say in interviews that an enormous amount of revision was involved in their book. Sometimes a year’s worth of revisions or more go into a book. Some authors say that in revision new characters were added or characters were taken out. Some characters had their jobs or their gender or their age changed. Plot points were added. Chapters were moved around or omitted entirely. Secondary plots were changed. The point is that the book as published is often vastly different from the initial draft (with a few notable exceptions, which I think could have stood a few revisions.)

Still, many of us sit down to write our first book (or our first article) and after hours of work rip it up because it’s not good enough. Or we keep it but we lose sleep thinking about how terrible it is or what frauds we are. Or we think about writing the book but we avoid actually doing so because we’re afraid it just won’t be good enough. Even if we know intellectually that great writing involves revision, we’re still too afraid that what we put on paper won’t be perfect, so we don’t bother and we never find out what our book could have been.

I don’t know that there’s a simple answer to this. The obvious answer is to say, “Sit down, put pen to paper (or fingers to keyboard) and just write. Don’t worry about what comes out of that,” but I know for some people it just isn’t as simple as that. Which is too bad, because I bet there are many great books just waiting to come out, but they never will because the author was too worried about perfection.

So, I’ll just say this. In honour of National Novel Writing Month I dare you all to sit down and work on your great novel (or article, or something else that should be written that you’ve been too afraid to get to). You don’t have to sign up for NaNoWriMo if you don’t want to, but challenge yourself to stop focussing on what you think you could go wrong and focus on what could go right–you could write a fantastic book.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a dance routine to practice. And boy, do I need practice.

The Curse of the So-Called Staff Writer

5 Comments

Today’s post is written to help you other freelance writers out there avoid a situation I recently found myself in. Unfortunately, I didn’t see it as a “situation” until other freelancers pointed out to me the perils of what was happening. I think it’s something that not a lot of writers have experience with, so I’m sharing my story with the hope that it can help you avoid a similar situation.

The problem is when a publisher offers you a “staff writer” position, but you still have to invoice the client (I know those of you out there familiar with this sort of situation shuddered when you read that).

Now, when I was faced with that prospect, I thought that the invoicing was just another way of handing in my timesheet, no big deal. Rather than a time sheet, I send an invoice with the hours worked and get paid (except that I haven’t yet been paid, which is another issue).

So what’s the problem? The problem is that in these situations, the publisher is trying to have the best of both worlds: retaining copyright at a low fee while not actually having a staff writer, and therefore not having to provide any of the perks that go with having an employee. It doesn’t matter if the heading of the contract says “staff writer,” if you’re invoicing the client, you’re probably not staff.

Why is it a problem for me? Well, if I were actually a staff writer I would have the protection of my local labour board when it comes to disputes with my publisher (for example, not getting paid). But because I’m invoicing the client, the labour board likely won’t see me as staff, so I’ll have no help tracking down the owed money.

Because I thought I was a staff writer when I signed the contract, I had no problem agreeing to the copyright clause. Except that I’ve now found out that I’m not an employee, I’m still a contractor. So, I signed away copyright and I don’t have any of the protections or perks that being an employee would provide. The publisher has the best of both worlds and I have the worst of them.

Now, I’m trying to figure out if the publisher’s lack of paying results in copyright reverting to me or what I have to do to get copyright back. I’m also trying to figure out how to ensure I’ll get paid. But I’ve resolved that unless I’m actually fully a staff writer (no invoicing required), I’m not signing a staff writer contract. It’s too messy and complicated. And it’s just not worth it.

Older Entries Newer Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 141 other followers